簡介:面對中國的崛起,一些學者主張東協國家將選擇要麼扈從中國(與最大威脅聯盟),要麼與他國聯盟對抗中國,而其他人則認為他們將採取一種更為溫和的政策,即所謂的「避險」。在考慮這些戰略選擇時,東協國家必須考慮到在該地區的經濟和安全結構中的個別利益。
研究論文標題
A harmonized Southeast Asia? Explanatory typologies of ASEAN countries’ strategies to the rise of China
和諧的東南亞?解釋東盟國家應對中國崛起的戰略類型
作者
Ian Tsung-yen Chen(陳宗巖)
Alan Hao Yang(楊昊)
關鍵字
Southeast Asia, China, explanatory typology, hedging, bandwagoning, balancing
東南亞、中國、解釋類型、避險、扈從、平衡
文章語言
英文
出版刊物
The Pacific Review (SSCI)
卷期
第26卷,第3期,頁碼265-288
文章連結(DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2012.759260
引用
Chen, Ian Tsung-yen and Alan Hao Yang. 2013. “A harmonized Southeast Asia? Explanatory typologies of ASEAN countries’ strategies to the rise of China.” The Pacific Review, 26(3): 265-288.
英文摘要
In the face of a rising China, some scholars have argued that ASEAN countries will choose to either bandwagon with or balance against China, while others believe they will respond with a more moderate policy known as ‘hedging’. In considering these options, ASEAN countries must take into account their individual interests within the economic and security structure of this region. In this research, we argue that each ASEAN country confronts divergent sets of security and economic relations with China, which play a major role in shaping their policy responses. We can characterize their responses into four quadrants. Each cell can be categorized in terms of a high or low degree of threat perception (HT or LT) from China, as well as a positive or negative economic expectation (PE or NE) with China. We thus hypothesize that ASEAN countries in the HT–NE situation will balance against China; those in the LT–PE situation will bandwagon with China; those in the HT–PE or LT–NE situations will hedge against China. Hypotheses are supported by three case studies, Vietnam–China (HT–NE), Cambodia–China (LT–PE) and Singapore–China (HT–PE) relations.
中文摘要
面對中國的崛起,一些學者主張東協國家將選擇要麼扈從中國(與最大威脅聯盟),要麼與他國聯盟對抗中國,而其他人則認為他們將採取一種更為溫和的政策,即所謂的「避險」。在考慮這些戰略選擇時,東協國家必須考慮到在該地區的經濟和安全結構中的個別利益。在這項研究中,我們主張每個東協國家都面臨著與中國不同的安全和經濟關係,這些關係在塑造他們的政策回應方面起著重要作用。我們可以將他們的回應分為四個象限。每個單元都可以根據對來自中國的威脅感知程度高或低(HT或LT),以及對中國的經濟期望正向或負向(PE或NE)來分類。因此,我們假設處於HT-NE情況下的東協國家將對抗中國;處於LT-PE情況下的國家將結盟中國;處於HT-PE或LT-NE情況下的國家將避險中國。這些假設得到了三個案例研究的支持,分別是越南-中國(HT-NE)、柬埔寨-中國(LT-PE)和新加坡-中國(HT-PE)的關係。